By Π‘ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ½ Π.Π.
Π‘ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ½ Π.Π., 2017, Π‘Π΅ΡΠΈΡ: Mediaevalia
ΠΠ½ΠΈΠ³Π° ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎ Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ Π² ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Π³ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΠ°Π»Π»ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π½Π΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΎ-Π³Π΅ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π·Π°. ΠΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ, ΡΡΠΎ Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ°Π½Π½Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π‘ΡΠ΅Π΄Π½Π΅Π²Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΡ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π»ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ. ΠΠ»Π°ΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ²Π°Π»Π°ΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ, Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠΎΠ²ΡΠΉ ΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΡ Π² Π°Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ²ΠΈ. Π‘ΡΠ΄Π΅Π±Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»Ρ ΡΠΈΠΊΡΠΈΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠ΅Π·Π΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΊΡΠΊΠΈΡ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΉ.
D.N. Starostin, 2017, Series: Mediaevalia
This book examines perceptions of power in Merovingian Gaul, clarifying the trends and periodization of Romano-Germanic synthesis. Analysis of various sources reveals commonalities in how early medieval authors perceived political phenomena. Power was based on consensus among rulers, nobility, and the church hierarchy. A new topos emerged in hagiographic literature, portraying kings as sacred patrons of the church. Court records document a significant transformation in the political representation of Frankish sovereigns.